In a letter sent to Dr Khan in September 2011, Snell said she had been hired by Ecosse Films as a consultant and that both she and the filmmaker were ‘dedicated to ensuring that the relationship is depicted as truthfully as possible and with discretion’.
- divorce parents dating effects on children
- Freelivi sexchat philippnes com
- who is jason newsted dating
- asian dating in uk
- plenty of fish dating website
- Adult flirting dating chat free apps
He didn’t expect to hear from Scotland Yard again, but in January this year he received a letter from officers at the Specialist Crime Directorate asking him to contact them.
‘Even after two years, the relationship wasn’t leading to a meaningful progression or conclusion and that was the main stress on both of us,’ he said. I have never met or talked or written to Bernstein and I have never given any approval in a direct or indirect manner.’‘I only had one meeting with Kate Snell. I said, “I will not give you their addresses and phone numbers, but if you get in touch with them, I can’t stop you seeing them.
Another of Diana’s friends, Rosa Monckton, said she was convinced the Princess’s relationship with Dodi Fayed in the last weeks of her life was little more than an attempt to make jealous the man she truly loved – Dr Khan.‘Most of it is going to be based on gossip, and if I watched it I would be sitting there saying, “That’s wrong, that’s wrong, that’s not right” every second. It would be ‘He trusted her to the extent that he allowed her to meet his family and his friends and it’s through that relationship that we were able to move forward, and we’re confident that there is a sort of tacit acceptance from his family and Hasnat that what we are doing is OK.’But Dr Khan rubbished the claim: ‘It is a complete lie. It is up to them.” That is how I left it.‘She [Snell] wrote to me quite a lot recently telling me about the movie and saying she wanted to get the record straight. I haven’t replied to any of those letters and I haven’t spoken to anyone involved in the film,’ he said.
‘I don’t see this movie doing well at all,’ he said.‘It is based on gossip and Diana’s friends talking about a relationship that they didn’t know much about, and some of my relatives who didn’t know much about it either.
It is all based on hypotheses and gossip.’Dr Khan said he had seen a still image from the film, while he was doing an online search, showing the actors playing him [Andrews] and Diana [Watts] side by side at the hospital where they met.
It convinced him the movie would badly misrepresent their relationship.He told The Mail on Sunday last year it was the ‘non-progression’ of the relationship that led to Diana’s decision to end it in the summer of 1997. This lady who I didn’t know came to Brompton Hospital and I had coffee with her in the coffee shop.‘I said if you are asking for my permission, I will not say go and speak to them, but I remember distinctly saying, “If you want to and if they agree, I can’t do anything about it”.Last year he was told by police involved in the Operation Weeting phone hacking investigation that his mobile may have been hacked in 2007 by the News of the World – an experience he said left him feeling violated.The surgeon – who is single again after an arranged marriage to the 29-year-old daughter of an Afghan noble family in 2006 ended in divorce after 18 months – said of Princess Diana’s early death: ‘There are a hundred could-have-beens. I can’t change anything now.’Talking of the project, which has struggled against delays and lack of funding, he said: ‘Diana would have been involved in this – absolutely.‘She (Diana) could be living very happily and married and having more kids, with me or with someone else. It wouldn’t have mattered whether we were together or not.‘To know that someone has been listening to your private messages is awful,’ Dr Khan said. Further details were not forthcoming, but he was asked if he wanted police to investigate further.