Science also has a habit of shaking up the deepest foundations if they rest on a bed of lies.
- ru russian dating comsearch
- matt di angelo and flavia cacace dating
- ugly chick dating
- quaker dating system
Without the weight of historical tradition and without the stamp of truth, the Ramayana would have been swept by the tidal waves of conquests that swept India.
But there are others who argue that there is no proof Rama lived.
The British and their acolytes like Max Muller were primarily responsible for the prevailing stereotypes about Indian history, religion and culture.
Muller, who was in the pay of the East India Company, went so far as to describe the Vedas as childish poetry.
In the late 1980s divers of the National Institute of Oceanography, Goa, led by leading archaeologist S. Rao discovered Krishna’s sunken capital Dwarka, precisely at the place in Gujarat where Krishna mentioned it was located.
Palaces, pillars, fort walls, a port, anchors, and various artefacts have been discovered.In her History of India, academician Romilla Thapar describes the celebrated Rig-Veda as “primitive animism”, the Mahabharata as the glorification of a “local feud” between two Aryan tribes, the Ramayana as “a description of local conflicts between the agriculturists of the Ganges Valley and the more primitive hunting and food-gathering societies of the Vindhyan region” (sic).But the Ramayana, Mahabharata, and other ancient Indian texts like the Vedas, Puranas and Upanishads are true records of Indian history, interwoven with mythology, philosophy and spirituality.Just because they talk about battles between gods and demons is no reason to dismiss their accounts of kings and other contemporary developments as great story telling.It is indeed amazing that the Bible mentions numerous fantastic events like the Great Deluge, Pillar of Fire, instantaneous healing of cut-off ears, and is yet considered a history of Christianity and Jews, while the ancient Indian texts are considered “mere” mythology. Just like the laws of motion cannot be questioned, scientific evidence is incontrovertible.This is perhaps the first instance in modern Indian history that a historical fact was established through scientific methods. So the Mahabharata was true, and since it mentions incidents from the Ramayana, then doesn’t it prove that Rama also existed?